we have rounded up the latest legacy sector news & insights.
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

Not loading? View in browser

Welcome to the spring edition of our Legacy Loop newsletter. With the lighter evenings and the extra bank holiday in May, we have it all to look forward to!


The good news at the probate registry is that they are now allowing solicitors to pay probate fees via card payments, so hopefully this may speed applications up a little. As news of the financial impact of the delays is now making headlines in the press it should encourage the probate registry to push through their backlog much

Andrew Wilkinson
Partner

quicker. However, I expect it will take until the summer for them to get back to their previous, usual timescales - fingers crossed!


It's been an interesting time in the world of legacies lately. Legacy professionals everywhere must have been comforted to hear that a man who created a false document in order to steal £2 million from a charity was jailed in February for fraud. This was a great example of legacy workers investigating all aspects of estates where their charities were named and demonstrates the importance of thorough legacy administration procedures! If you need training or support with your legacy administration processes, please reach out.


With the sad passing of the late Paul O’Grady, it’s wonderful to see in memory giving being supported publicly, along with tribute platforms. Paul’s legacy will encourage people to consider their charitable giving and, hopefully, leave a gift in their will. It’s wonderful to see the difference one person can make!


As Spring is a time for spring cleaning, if you have any complex matters you’d like some support with then we would be pleased to help you. We are always available for a chat, whether in person or online. We also have a number of events planned that you may like to add to your diary. I can wholeheartedly recommend the trustees’ training sessions. If your trustees are on board with your legacy plans then you have their understanding and support (and that of their networks too!).


Also, a date for your diaries, on the 22 June we will be hosting our Legacy Loop Live event in Battersea, so look out for more details on this landing in your inboxes in the coming weeks. 


Below is a round-up of recent news and articles - I hope you enjoy them. Do also let us have your feedback by completing the survey at the end of this newsletter, and if you or your business need any assistance, please get in contact.



With best wishes

Andrew

BENEFICIARY RIGHTS IN RELATION TO LEGAL COSTS AGREED UPON BY THE EXECUTOR

The recent case of Daniel Kenig –v- Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2023] EWHC 181 (SCCO) relates to a beneficiary’s challenge to legal costs that had been approved by the executor.


Philippa Cunnick died in July 2019 leaving an estate of £2.9m to be divided equally between her son (Daniel Kenig) and daughter. The deceased appointed her brother as the executor.


The executor instructed solicitors (Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP) to administer the estate and they estimated their fees would be between £10,000-£15,000 plus VAT and expenses. Probate was granted in January 2020 by which point the solicitors had billed £54,411 plus VAT and expenses.


Kenig requested and was provided with invoices and time ledgers showing the sums billed and subsequently objected to the sums billed on the basis they were excessive and that the administration of the estate was not complex. He later sought an assessment of the invoices as “a person interested in any property out of which the trustee, executor or administrator has paid” under the Solicitors Act 1974.


Kenig’s claim was defended by the solicitors but their arguments, which included that there were no special circumstances justifying assessment and that documents relevant to the case were privileged with that privilege belonging to the executor, were deemed insufficient by the judge who had serious concerns about overcharging.


The judge considered there was a clear and substantial discrepancy between the estimate provided and the costs billed and that generally when this is the case, an explanation from the solicitor is required. The judge said that to his mind a beneficiary should be entitled to seek an assessment of costs and that it would be odd if there could not be proper scrutiny of the costs of solicitors administering an estate. An assessment of all the bills was ordered.

TIMESCALES FOR APPLYING FOR THE

GRANT OF REPRESENTATION

The grant of representation if a legal document issued by the probate registry to confirm those who are legally entitled to administer an estate. Every case is different, and the time scales for the length of time that it takes for personal representatives (PRs) to obtain the grant does vary.


PRs can make an application for the grant of representation either online or by post. If the application is complex, then the PRs would need to make a postal application. Probate practitioners must send their postal applications to the Newcastle District Probate Registry, whereas applications made by lay PR’s are sent to the probate registry in Harlow.


The average time that it is taking the probate registry to issue a grant (having made the application online) is approximately 16 weeks. However, one of our matters, which incorporated a foreign element, took approximately five to six months.


The postal application is a much longer process than the online application, with one of our applications taking approximately four months to complete.


It will take even longer if the probate registry requests additional paperwork i.e. an affidavit of plight and condition or due execution (online or postal application).


If you are waiting for an update, the probate registry will not look in to the progress of the application until after the ’16 week period’ has passed.


If any inheritance tax is due on the estate, then the PRs must submit the inheritance tax return in form IHT 400 to HM Revenue & Customs. The PRs must then wait at least 20 working days before they can apply for the grant of representation. HM Revenue & Customs will send an electronic IHT 421 to the probate registry which will allow them to proceed with the application for the grant of representation. On average, HMRC are returning the IHT 421 within this time frame.


It is not advisable to submit the application for the grant of representation before the 20 working days has passed as this may result in the grant application being rejected and put to the ‘back of the queue’.

OUR LATEST THOUGHTS & NEWS

We've rounded up our most recent content for the legacy sector

BLOG - 3 minute read

The impact of probate registry delays on estates

Read now

 

BLOG - 7 minute read

Leaving money to charity in a will

Read now

 

BLOG - 3 minute read

Where legal meets moral - considering the status of ex gratia payments

Read now
View all our news & insights

JOIN OUR UPCOMING EVENTS

Including webinars, conferences, award shows and more

EVENTS

Advanced Trustee Training Sessions

• Advanced session #1: Wednesday 24 May, 10:00

• Advanced session #2: Wednesday 7 June, 14:00

Register now

 

CONFERENCE

ILM Annual Conference 2023

Friday 12 May, 09:00 - 19:00

Join us

 

CONFERENCE

Association of Dogs and Cats Homes Conference 2023

Tuesday 16 - Wednesday 17 May

Register now

 

CONFERENCE

The Legacy Strategy Summit 2023

Tuesday 20 June, 09:30 - 17:00

Register now

 

SAVE THE DATE

LEGACY LOOP LIVE

Thursday 22 June


Offering insights into the latest legal updates and discussing stewardship in a post-COVID world.

We will run through how Legacy Officers can be more resilient in difficult times, dealing with sensitive issues and difficult people, and how to lead in a hybrid working environment.


Look out for email invitations in the coming week offering more details.

View all our events

Let's talk.

We're ready to help. Contact our team today.

Call us
Contact us
Feedback

We are here to help, get in contact with us

We'd love to understand how we can help you and your business you can request a free callback by visiting: shma.co.uk/get-in-contact/ or you can call us on 0330 024 0333

Unsubscribe


Our Policy

Shakespeare Martineau LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with number OC319029.  Its registered office is No 1 Colmore Square, Birmingham, United Kingdom, B4 6AA.
‘Lime’, ‘Corclaim’ and ‘Marrons Planning’ are business names of Shakespeare Martineau LLP. 
The members of Shakespeare Martineau LLP are Ampa Holdings LLP, Andrew Whitehead and Sarah Walker-Smith. 
Any reference to ‘partner’ in relation to Shakespeare Martineau LLP is a reference to a member of Ampa Holdings LLP or an employee or consultant of Shakespeare Martineau LLP with equivalent standing and qualifications and are authorised by Shakespeare Martineau LLP to execute and to bind that entity accordingly.
Ampa Holdings LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with number OC435936. Its registered office is No. 1 Colmore Square, Birmingham, United Kingdom, B4 6AA. A list of its members is available for inspection at its registered office. Ampa Holdings LLP is a member of Ampa Ventures Limited, a company limited by guarantee (registered number 13254321 in England and Wales) with its registered office at 60 Gracechurch Street, London, United Kingdom, EC3V 0HR. 

Neither Ampa Holdings LLP nor Ampa Ventures Limited provide legal or other services to clients. 
The members of Ampa Ventures Limited carry on business as separate and autonomous legal entities. They are not one organisation nor, partnership, and the members of Ampa Ventures Limited are not in partnership with each other.
Shakespeare Martineau (Glasgow) LLP is a discrete Scottish law firm and a limited liability partnership, registered in Scotland with number SO306986. Its registered office is 272 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G2 4JR. The members (referred to, day to day, as partners) are Amal Kaur and James Gooch. All entities referred to in this statement act with integrity and in an ethical manner and will not engage in any form of bribery and comply with the Bribery Act 2010. 
Further information is available in 
our legal information.

Shakespeare Martineau LLP, No 1, 1 Colmore Square, Birmingham, B4 6AA


Shakespeare Martineau LLP, will process your personal data fairly and lawfully in accordance with professional standards and the Data Protection Act 2018, General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (as applicable) and any other applicable laws relating to the protection of personal data and the privacy of individuals. Further information is available in our privacy policy.

Regulators
Shakespeare Martineau LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with number 442480 and operates in accordance with the regulatory requirements set out in the SRA Standards and Regulations specifically the Principles, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs and the Code of Conduct for Firms; known collectively as the SRA Codes. For further information please visit here
Ampa Holdings Limited is authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) number 819025.
Shakespeare Martineau (Glasgow) LLP is authorised and regulated by The Law Society of Scotland under registration number 61036. A copy of the Law Society of Scotland Standards of Conduct and Standards of Service can be found on their website. 


©2021 Shakespeare Martineau LLP